Amazon's GB300 racks sit idle in warehouses over power shortfall
10/20/2026 — 10/21, 10:19·2 sources (all)·2 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- Business Insider reports that some of Amazon's Nvidia GB300 server racks cannot be deployed because its data centers lack enough power, leav…
Background & analysis
Business Insider reported on October 19, 2026 that some of the Nvidia GB300 server racks Amazon has purchased are sitting in warehouses because the data centers meant to host them lack enough power to turn them on. Citing internal Amazon emails, the report said the company expected to take delivery of about $5 billion worth of GB300 racks in August 2026 and roughly $3 billion per month after that, a pace expected to continue for the foreseeable future. The target data centers reportedly have room for more racks but not enough available power to boot them, so the equipment is held in an intermediate warehouse. Because Amazon must pay for the hardware before it is deployed and operating in order to take ownership early, cash goes out sooner.
At an internal staff meeting in September 2026, AWS chief financial officer John Felton told Prasad Kalyanaraman, the executive overseeing AI infrastructure, that he had turned the company's free cash flow negative. Kalyanaraman did not dispute the remark and said free cash flow is expected to stay negative for roughly the next few years. The reporting also noted that Amazon's 2026 capital expenditure is projected at $220 billion, and that when the company reported second-quarter results in July, its trailing free cash flow had turned negative at -$7.6 billion, the first such shift in years.
The account currently stops at what the internal documents and meeting recording show: the racks remain in storage, the power shortfall has not been resolved, and Amazon has not publicly commented on the matter.
AI-generated from 2 reports · updated 2 hours ago
Latest turnAWS is parking Nvidia GB300 racks in intermediate warehouses because target data centers have room but "not enough available power to turn them on," according to Amazon internal documents and a staff meeting recording obtained by Business Insider. Amazon expected to take delivery of about $5 billion in GB300 racks in August alone and roughly $3 billion a month thereafter, while its CFO said free cash flow has turned negative.
- Heat index
- 149
- All sources
- 2
- All reports
- 2
- First seen
- 20 hours ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
AWS is parking Nvidia GB300 racks in intermediate warehouses because target data centers have room but "not enough available power to turn them on," according to Amazon internal documents and a staff meeting recording obtained by Business Insider. Amazon expected to take delivery of about $5 billion in GB300 racks in August alone and roughly $3 billion a month thereafter, while its CFO said free cash flow has turned negative.
华尔街见闻AI score 64
Business Insider reports that some of Amazon's NVIDIA GB300 server racks cannot be deployed because its data centers lack sufficient power, leaving the hardware stored in warehouses. The report says Amazon's 2026 capital spending is projected at $220 billion, with free cash flow expected to stay negative for roughly the next two years.
智东西AI score 63
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 892DHS orders federal civilian agencies to purge DeepSeek tech17 sources
- Heat index 776DeepSeek open-sources DeepInfer large-scale inference framework12 sources
- Heat index 718RisingMiniMax M3.1 Flash launches on Cline and gmi_cloud17 sources
- Heat index 627RisingGoogle open-sources TorchTPU as PyTorch/XLA nears archival9 sources
- Heat index 591RisingSpaceX earnings call: Musk says 2027 ARR could reach $1 trillion7 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion
