HaiAI123

Curated Global AI Tools Directory

Industry update
Flat

Replit releases ViBench 2.0 benchmark and model build results

10/29/2026 — 10/29, 06:19·1 sources (all)·4 reports (all)

Key takeaways

  • Replit released ViBench 2.0, a long-horizon software-building benchmark where agents start from an empty project and implement features one…

Background & analysis

On October 29, 2026, Replit released ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software building. Agents start from an empty project and build a whole product one feature at a time, without seeing what comes next. The benchmark is designed to test whether models can sustain work across an entire product, not just individual tasks.

Replit then published its build evaluation results: three models passed more than 40% of their builds, while no other model reached 20%. GPT-6.1 Sol led with a 65% pass rate, edging out GPT-6 Astra at 60%, at roughly $12 per build versus about $90. Opus 5.5 passed 49% and finished a build in around 70 minutes, about 2.5x faster than Sol, mostly due to API provider speed. Replit also reported that newer models score higher: on the 8 public products, pass@1 rose from 0% for GPT-5.4 to 31% for GPT-6 Sol and 53% for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-6.1 Terra passed 47% at about half Sol's cost.

On failure patterns, Replit noted that every feature works on its own but breaks when they come together. Around three quarters of the top models' failed builds passed every single-feature check, and the failures occurred where features meet. Examples included a code hosting draft PR that never showed its merge conflict, and a document editor in which nobody could comment on a word inside the document. The event currently stands at Replit's publication of the benchmark, its evaluation results, and its failure analysis, with no third-party reproduction or independent verification reported yet.

AI-generated from 4 reports · updated 13 hours ago

Latest turnReplit said on X that every feature works on its own but breaks when combined: about 3/4 of top models' failed builds pass every single-feature check and fail where features meet. Examples include a draft PR not showing its merge conflict in code hosting and no one being able to comment on a word in a document editor.

Related AI tools

24-hour heatHeat index 67 · peak 98 · 13h ago
24 hours agonow

Reports on this story headlines open the original

Today
  1. Replit said on X that every feature works on its own but breaks when combined: about 3/4 of top models' failed builds pass every single-feature check and fail where features meet. Examples include a draft PR not showing its merge conflict in code hosting and no one being able to comment on a word in a document editor.

    X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 60
  2. Replit said on X that newer models score higher: across 8 public products, pass@1 goes from 0% for GPT-5.4 to 31% for GPT-6 Sol and 53% for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-6.1 Terra passes 47% at about half of Sol's cost.

    X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 59
  3. Replit published ViBench 2.0 build results: GPT-6.1 Sol leads with a 65% pass rate, followed by GPT-6 Astra at 60%, at roughly $12 versus $90 per build. Opus 5.5 passes 49% of builds and finishes in about 70 minutes, roughly 2.5x faster than Sol, mostly due to API provider speed.

    X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 60
  4. Replit released ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software building. Agents start from an empty project and build a whole product one feature at a time without seeing what comes next, testing whether models can sustain long-running tasks. The benchmark is designed to measure end-to-end product building rather than isolated coding tasks.

    X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 67

Other stories people are talking about

How is heat calculated?About the method

Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.

This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.

Surge
Discussion rising fast
New
First report within 6 hours
Rising
Still gathering discussion

Back to AI industry updates →