Replit releases ViBench 2.0 benchmark and model build results
10/29/2026 — 10/29, 06:19·1 sources (all)·4 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- Replit released ViBench 2.0, a long-horizon software-building benchmark where agents start from an empty project and implement features one…
Background & analysis
On October 29, 2026, Replit released ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software building. Agents start from an empty project and build a whole product one feature at a time, without seeing what comes next. The benchmark is designed to test whether models can sustain work across an entire product, not just individual tasks.
Replit then published its build evaluation results: three models passed more than 40% of their builds, while no other model reached 20%. GPT-6.1 Sol led with a 65% pass rate, edging out GPT-6 Astra at 60%, at roughly $12 per build versus about $90. Opus 5.5 passed 49% and finished a build in around 70 minutes, about 2.5x faster than Sol, mostly due to API provider speed. Replit also reported that newer models score higher: on the 8 public products, pass@1 rose from 0% for GPT-5.4 to 31% for GPT-6 Sol and 53% for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-6.1 Terra passed 47% at about half Sol's cost.
On failure patterns, Replit noted that every feature works on its own but breaks when they come together. Around three quarters of the top models' failed builds passed every single-feature check, and the failures occurred where features meet. Examples included a code hosting draft PR that never showed its merge conflict, and a document editor in which nobody could comment on a word inside the document. The event currently stands at Replit's publication of the benchmark, its evaluation results, and its failure analysis, with no third-party reproduction or independent verification reported yet.
AI-generated from 4 reports · updated 13 hours ago
Latest turnReplit said on X that every feature works on its own but breaks when combined: about 3/4 of top models' failed builds pass every single-feature check and fail where features meet. Examples include a draft PR not showing its merge conflict in code hosting and no one being able to comment on a word in a document editor.
Related AI tools
- Heat index
- 67
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 4
- First seen
- 14 hours ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
Replit said on X that every feature works on its own but breaks when combined: about 3/4 of top models' failed builds pass every single-feature check and fail where features meet. Examples include a draft PR not showing its merge conflict in code hosting and no one being able to comment on a word in a document editor.
X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 60Replit said on X that newer models score higher: across 8 public products, pass@1 goes from 0% for GPT-5.4 to 31% for GPT-6 Sol and 53% for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-6.1 Terra passes 47% at about half of Sol's cost.
X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 59Replit published ViBench 2.0 build results: GPT-6.1 Sol leads with a 65% pass rate, followed by GPT-6 Astra at 60%, at roughly $12 versus $90 per build. Opus 5.5 passes 49% of builds and finishes in about 70 minutes, roughly 2.5x faster than Sol, mostly due to API provider speed.
X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 60Replit released ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software building. Agents start from an empty project and build a whole product one feature at a time without seeing what comes next, testing whether models can sustain long-running tasks. The benchmark is designed to measure end-to-end product building rather than isolated coding tasks.
X:Replit (@Replit)AI score 67
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 138Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5 with 60% private scoring, open-weight models trail by 12 points3 sources
- Heat index 172SurgeReport: DeepSeek and Moonshot Trained Models on GPT-6 Astra Outputs2 sources
- Heat index 176OpenAI publishes GPT-6.1 Terra safety evaluation: overall risk down, but unauthorized actions in multi-Agent coding rise to 13.75%4 sources
- Heat index 69AA-Robotics demo compares Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra on robot-arm writing1 sources
- Heat index 1439RisingGemini 4 Carbon tops security benchmarks, opens first to cyber defenders20 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion

