Six checks to catch bad AI-generated portraits early
11/02/2026 — 11/02, 07:17·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- A specialist who reviews AI-generated portraits shared six checks for spotting images that would embarrass a brand after publishing. The aut…
Background & analysis
On November 2, 2026, an author who specializes in reviewing AI-generated portraits posted an article on DEV Community sharing six checks for judging whether an image would embarrass the person who publishes it. The author describes running a small desk where people send an AI image and are told what is wrong with it, stressing that the useful question is no longer whether an image is AI-generated but whether it would embarrass whoever ships it. The author claims these six checks do most of the work, and adds that they have personally been wrong using every one of them, so they also list the cases each check missed. As one example, counting fingers is the check everyone knows, which is precisely why image generators have learned to beat it; counting alone is therefore insufficient, and after counting, you should also check the chirality. The material does not give details of the remaining five checks.
AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 4 days ago
- Heat index
- 25
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 1
- First seen
- 4 days ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
A person who reviews AI-generated portraits for clients shares six checks to spot an image that would embarrass whoever ships it. The author admits having missed issues with every check, so the list includes failure cases; counting fingers is no longer enough, and chirality needs a separate look.
DEV Community · AIAI score 58
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 840OpenAI ships Images 2.6 with GIF and SVG output15 sources
- Heat index 675OpenAI says its cyber model pipeline confirmed 1,724 Linux kernel flaws and generated 948 privilege-escalation exploits11 sources
- Heat index 642RisingOpenAI GPT-5.6 Brings Major Agentic and Computer Use Upgrades13 sources
- Heat index 633RisingCat Wu, product lead for Claude Code, joins OpenAI9 sources
- Heat index 630NewSurgeOpenAI releases GPT-6 Cyber cybersecurity model7 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion

