Agent's 100% accuracy was fake: author reviews how to optimize
11/02/2026 — 11/02, 18:19·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- A developer on Juejin reflects that running the same question three times produced answers from three different domains, revealing that the…
Background & analysis
On 2026-11-02 at 17:09, a developer published a retrospective article on Juejin explaining that the 100% accuracy an Agent had scored in his earlier evaluations did not hold up. The post describes how he discovered the flaw: he ran the same question three times and received three answers drawn from entirely different domains. The article goes on to cover how he identified this problem and how he subsequently adjusted his evaluation setup and optimization workflow. Only this one account has surfaced so far, so the incident currently rests at the stage where the author has made the retrospective public.
AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 3 days ago
- Heat index
- 25
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 1
- First seen
- 3 days ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
A developer writing on Juejin found that running the same question three times returned answers from three different domains, exposing that an earlier 100% accuracy score was not real. The post covers how the flaw surfaced and how the evaluation and optimization process was changed.
掘金AI score 52
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 840OpenAI ships Images 2.6 with GIF and SVG output15 sources
- Heat index 675OpenAI says its cyber model pipeline confirmed 1,724 Linux kernel flaws and generated 948 privilege-escalation exploits11 sources
- Heat index 642RisingOpenAI GPT-5.6 Brings Major Agentic and Computer Use Upgrades13 sources
- Heat index 633RisingCat Wu, product lead for Claude Code, joins OpenAI9 sources
- Heat index 630NewSurgeOpenAI releases GPT-6 Cyber cybersecurity model7 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion