DeepMind: supervised AI agents find two weaknesses in 1024-bit RSA
11/07/2026 — 11/07, 20:16·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- Google DeepMind said on November 6 that human-supervised AI agents found two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA, detailed in two non-peer-rev…
Background & analysis
Google DeepMind announced on November 6, 2026 that AI agents operating under human supervision had identified two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA cryptography. The findings are set out in two working papers published on November 5 and November 6, 2026, titled Modular Roots from a Restricted Oracle and Fan Factories, neither of which has been peer-reviewed. According to the reporting, the theoretical estimate for the signature-forgery direction is roughly 1,600 times better than the previous best-known approach. Materials reviewed here contain no detail on whether the papers have been accepted anywhere, who the co-authors are beyond the partial listing of Krishnamurthy (Dj), or what implications the weaknesses may have for real-world deployments of legacy 1024-bit RSA. The two papers cover distinct lines of work: the first treats modular roots accessible through a restricted oracle, while the second develops the fan-factory construction. Both are described as results from agents working under human oversight rather than fully autonomous systems. As of the latest available report, no follow-up has been published, and the materials do not address whether the findings have been shared with standardization bodies or cryptographic research communities.
AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 5 hours ago
- Heat index
- 86
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 1
- First seen
- 5 hours ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
Google DeepMind said on November 6 that AI agents working under human supervision found two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA, described in two working papers released November 5 and 6 that have not been peer reviewed. One result gives a theoretical estimate about 1,600 times better than the previous best method for signature forgery.
DEV Community · AIAI score 54
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 755OpenAI closes $11B tranche at $1.25T valuation, down from a $30B plan12 sources
- Heat index 711Anthropic IPO valuation expectations fall to $1.1 trillion amid AI selloff14 sources
- Heat index 509Meta adds Spaces and a new model to Muse in the US11 sources
- Heat index 483Thinking Machines Lab releases Inkling 2 Small amid reported $5B funding round12 sources
- Heat index 366Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is now available via Gemini API, Google AI Studio and Google Cloud, generating native 15-second audio-video clips at $0.07 per second.10 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion

