HaiAI123

Curated Global AI Tools Directory

NewIndustry update
New

DeepMind: supervised AI agents find two weaknesses in 1024-bit RSA

11/07/2026 — 11/07, 20:16·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)

Key takeaways

  • Google DeepMind said on November 6 that human-supervised AI agents found two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA, detailed in two non-peer-rev…

Background & analysis

Google DeepMind announced on November 6, 2026 that AI agents operating under human supervision had identified two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA cryptography. The findings are set out in two working papers published on November 5 and November 6, 2026, titled Modular Roots from a Restricted Oracle and Fan Factories, neither of which has been peer-reviewed. According to the reporting, the theoretical estimate for the signature-forgery direction is roughly 1,600 times better than the previous best-known approach. Materials reviewed here contain no detail on whether the papers have been accepted anywhere, who the co-authors are beyond the partial listing of Krishnamurthy (Dj), or what implications the weaknesses may have for real-world deployments of legacy 1024-bit RSA. The two papers cover distinct lines of work: the first treats modular roots accessible through a restricted oracle, while the second develops the fan-factory construction. Both are described as results from agents working under human oversight rather than fully autonomous systems. As of the latest available report, no follow-up has been published, and the materials do not address whether the findings have been shared with standardization bodies or cryptographic research communities.

AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 5 hours ago

updream
24-hour heatHeat index 86 · peak 97 · 4h ago
24 hours agonow

Reports on this story headlines open the original

Yesterday
  1. Google DeepMind said on November 6 that AI agents working under human supervision found two weaknesses in legacy 1024-bit RSA, described in two working papers released November 5 and 6 that have not been peer reviewed. One result gives a theoretical estimate about 1,600 times better than the previous best method for signature forgery.

    DEV Community · AIAI score 54

Other stories people are talking about

How is heat calculated?About the method

Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.

This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.

Surge
Discussion rising fast
New
First report within 6 hours
Rising
Still gathering discussion

Back to AI industry updates →