HaiAI123

Curated Global AI Tools Directory

Industry update
Flat

Developer benchmarks 209 Claude Opus calls at about $0.11 each

11/12/2026 — 11/12, 18:20·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)

Key takeaways

  • A developer made 209 Claude Opus (claude-opus-5-5) calls over ten days across 22 task types, spending $23.7465 in total, or about $0.11362 p…

Background & analysis

On November 12, 2026, a post on DEV Community's AI section presented the results of a developer's hands-on test of Claude Opus (claude-opus-5-5). Over a ten-day window running from October 30 to November 8, 2026, the developer issued 209 calls to Claude Opus spanning 22 distinct task types. Total spending came to $23.7465, which works out to $0.11362 per call, with a median call duration of 18.1 seconds.

During the same period, the developer also ran Claude Sonnet (claude-sonnet-5-5) 156 times, at a cost of $0.0165 per call, a median of 2.3 seconds, and a slowest call of 19.2 seconds. On that basis, each Opus call cost roughly 7 times a Sonnet call, and its median duration was roughly 8 times longer. The post is the only publicly available report on this testing, and no further follow-up has been published so far.

AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 1 day ago

Related AI tools

updream
24-hour heatHeat index 46 · peak 92 · 23h ago
24 hours agonow

Reports on this story headlines open the original

Yesterday
  1. A developer ran 209 Claude Opus (claude-opus-5-5) calls over 10 days across 22 job types, spending $23.7465 total — about $0.11362 per call, with a median latency of 18.1 seconds. In the same window, Claude Sonnet (claude-sonnet-5-5) handled 156 calls at $0.0165 each, a 2.3-second median and a 19.2-second worst case. Opus cost roughly 7x Sonnet per call and ran about 8x longer at the median.

    DEV Community · AIAI score 54

Other stories people are talking about

How is heat calculated?About the method

Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.

This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.

Surge
Discussion rising fast
New
First report within 6 hours
Rising
Still gathering discussion

Back to AI industry updates →