Developer shares a spec-driven development workflow with Claude Code
10/19/2026 — 10/19, 11:19·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- A developer outlined a framework-free spec-driven development (SDD) process: write what to do, what not to do, and what counts as done into…
Background & analysis
On October 19, 2026, the Chinese developer site Juejin published an article by a developer describing a spec-driven development (SDD) workflow that runs on Claude Code without relying on any third-party framework. The author defines a spec as a short functional brief that answers three questions: what to build, what not to build, and what counts as done. In AI-assisted coding, the argument goes, a spec gains a second reader beyond humans, one that reads carefully and follows instructions closely.
The workflow puts that brief into a spec document stored in a specs/ directory. Custom Claude Code commands then generate a technical plan and a task list in sequence, with a human confirming each step. The author uses adding tag filtering to a to-do list API as the worked example and publishes spec, plan, and tasks command templates that readers can copy directly. The article also notes that GitHub's open-source Spec Kit and Amazon's Kiro promote similar ideas with differing details, and that their common backbone can be summarized in four steps. Splitting business concerns from technical ones into separate stages, the author says, keeps the two from blurring together.
The piece contrasts SDD with vibe coding: writing the documents costs roughly ten extra minutes, but saves hours of back-and-forth, and every line of code carries a recorded reason for existing, which helps with review, handover, and debugging. The material ends there, with the workflow presented as one developer's personal practice and templates; no further developments are reported.
AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 8 hours ago
Latest turnInstead of adopting a framework, the author builds a spec-driven development workflow on Claude Code's built-in custom commands: a spec.md pins down what to build, what to skip and what counts as done, then plan and task commands break the work down with a human approving each step. A tagging feature for a todo-list API serves as the worked example, and the command templates are copy-ready.
Related AI tools
- Heat index
- 70
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 1
- First seen
- 13 hours ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
Instead of adopting a framework, the author builds a spec-driven development workflow on Claude Code's built-in custom commands: a spec.md pins down what to build, what to skip and what counts as done, then plan and task commands break the work down with a human approving each step. A tagging feature for a todo-list API serves as the worked example, and the command templates are copy-ready.
掘金AI score 63
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 40Developer shares Claude Code workflow with local MCP shared memory1 sources
- Heat index 49Developer shares refactoring workflow combining ast-grep codemods with Claude Code1 sources
- Heat index 80Developer pins Claude Code and Codex model tiers by task type1 sources
- Heat index 33Developer logs 225B Claude Code tokens in 30 days1 sources
- Heat index 33Tutorial explains Claude Code subagents and Skills with examples1 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion
