HaiAI123

Curated Global AI Tools Directory

NewIndustry update
New

Kimi K3.1 Pro drops to ninth in Artificial Analysis v5

10/28/2026 — 10/28, 23:19·3 sources (all)·3 reports (all)

Key takeaways

  • Artificial Analysis has updated its Intelligence Index to v5, adding two coding and science benchmarks, upgrading three others, and making p…

Background & analysis

On 28 October 2026, Artificial Analysis announced the fifth version of its composite ranking, Intelligence Index v5. The update adds two new coding and science benchmarks and upgrades three more, and marks the first time the majority of the index is built on private datasets. According to the published results, Claude Opus 5.5 (max) takes the top spot at 58 points.

The Decoder reported the same day that the overhaul pushed Kimi K3.1 Pro down five places, from its original launch position of fourth to ninth, behind eight closed models. The gap between open models and the top of the leaderboard widened from 3 points to 12 points. The Decoder also noted that for the first time, 60 percent of the index's weight rests on private test sets, an attempt to curb benchmaxxing, the practice of training on known benchmark questions. Researcher Nathan Lambert argued that a large share of training gains already comes from reinforcement learning environments similar to the benchmarks themselves, implying that moving to private tests may not eliminate that effect.

After the update was published, users in Reddit's LocalLLaMA community debated the new placements. One user wrote that in v5.0 not a single open weight model appears in Artificial Analysis's Most Attractive Quadrant, and none comes close to the Pareto line, whereas the previous version at least treated DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, and Qwen as attractive or interesting. Because of this, the user said they would set aside the index and look at the underlying benchmarks instead.

As of now, the disagreement remains confined to community discussion, and Artificial Analysis has not publicly responded to the criticism over where open models land in the new index.

AI-generated from 3 reports · updated 26 minutes ago

Latest turnArtificial Analysis has overhauled its Intelligence Index: Kimi K3.1 Pro fell from fourth to ninth, and the gap between the best open model and the top of the leaderboard widened from 3 points to 12. For the first time, 60% of the index relies on private test sets to curb benchmark-specific training, though researcher Nathan Lambert notes much of today's progress comes from RL environments that resemble those benchmarks.

Related AI tools

24-hour heatHeat index 275 · peak 192 · 2h ago
24 hours agonow

Reports on this story headlines open the original

Today
  1. Artificial Analysis has overhauled its Intelligence Index: Kimi K3.1 Pro fell from fourth to ninth, and the gap between the best open model and the top of the leaderboard widened from 3 points to 12. For the first time, 60% of the index relies on private test sets to curb benchmark-specific training, though researcher Nathan Lambert notes much of today's progress comes from RL environments that resemble those benchmarks.

    The DecoderAI score 56
  2. Artificial Analysis released Intelligence Index v5, adding two coding and science benchmarks and upgrading three others; for the first time, most of the index is built on private datasets. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads the board at 58.

    TechmemeAI score 54
  3. Members of the Reddit LocalLLaMA community noted that the latest v5.0 index from Artificial Analysis features zero open-weight models in its Most Attractive Quadrant. This shift has sparked community discussions regarding evaluation biases and the positioning of open-source models.

    Reddit · LocalLLaMAAI score 55

Other stories people are talking about

How is heat calculated?About the method

Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.

This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.

Surge
Discussion rising fast
New
First report within 6 hours
Rising
Still gathering discussion

Back to AI industry updates →