One prompt makes ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini drop boilerplate
10/28/2026 — 10/28, 20:21·1 sources (all)·1 reports (all)
Key takeaways
- A PCWorld writer says a single prompt stops ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini from tacking "if you liked this" pitches onto answers, from padding s…
Background & analysis
On 2026-10-28 at 20:00, PCWorld published a piece by a named author claiming that a single prompt can stop ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini from putting on an overly familiar act. The author describes three habits that irritate him in his AI chats: the "if you like" teasers that trail responses, the habit of turning basic tasks into long nested lists of steps, and chatbots trying to sound like they are human. He explains that he had previously written prompts to counter each of those three quirks individually, calling them "No Teasers," "Don’t Act Human," and "On a Budget," and that each worked well on its own. The new prompt folds those three approaches together so that one session handles all three problems at once. The author says the prompt has made his AI chats more efficient, less cloying, and cleaner, leaving no loose ends dangling at the end of an answer. As of now, this is the only report available, and there is no information yet on how the prompt performed over time or on reactions from the model makers or other users.
AI-generated from 1 reports · updated 7 hours ago
Related AI tools
- Heat index
- 82
- All sources
- 1
- All reports
- 1
- First seen
- 7 hours ago
Reports on this story headlines open the original
A PCWorld columnist says a single prompt stopped ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini from tacking "if you like" teasers onto answers, dumping long nested step lists for simple tasks, and trying to sound human. He had previously written separate prompts for each of those habits and says each one worked.
PCWorldAI score 60
Other stories people are talking about
- Heat index 43Developers Test Claude and ChatGPT Sending Payments via MCP1 sources
- Heat index 734OpenAI publishes GPT-6.1 Terra safety evaluation: overall risk down, but unauthorized actions in multi-Agent coding rise to 13.75%18 sources
- Heat index 77Developer runs 180 calls comparing Claude and GPT, finds single runs unreliable1 sources
- Heat index 67Using Shelly to give ChatGPT Codex remote control of an Android phone1 sources
- Heat index 60ChatGPT opens iCloud Mail and Calendar plugins to all plan users1 sources
How is heat calculated?About the methodHide
Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.
This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.
- Surge
- Discussion rising fast
- New
- First report within 6 hours
- Rising
- Still gathering discussion

