HaiAI123

Curated Global AI Tools Directory

Industry update
Flat

Meta launches Muse Ember, a low-cost agent model benchmarking Haiku

11/10/2026 — 11/10, 20:22·14 sources (all)·19 reports (all)·In the 2026-11-10 briefing

Key takeaways

  • Meta Superintelligence Lab has released Muse Ember (muse-ember-1.0), its smallest and most cost-efficient model to date, trained with Muse W…

Background & analysis

On November 10, 2026 (November 9 local time in the United States), Meta Superintelligence Lab released Muse Ember, its smallest and most cost-efficient model to date. Meta describes it as built for the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks, request routing, data extraction and long document parsing. The model identifier is muse-ember-1.0. It supports a 1M-token context window, can output up to roughly 512k tokens, accepts text, image, audio, video and PDF input, and is available from launch day through the Meta Model API and Muse Code; IT之家 adds that it is also offered on Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud. Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg posted on X that this is Meta's smallest model so far, built for the high-token workloads agents run repeatedly, and Meta suggests pairing it with Muse Wonder: the larger model plans, Ember executes. SiliconANGLE and 智东西 report that Muse Ember is the first model trained using the flagship Muse Wonder (called Muse Wonder Full by 智东西, released on October 12 this year), though Meta did not specify which part of the workflow it automated.

On pricing, Muse Ember is listed at $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.004 per million cached input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. Artificial Analysis notes that its input and output token prices match Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) and GPT-6 Luna (max), but its cached input is 60% cheaper, and cached input accounts for most of the cost in its agentic evaluations. For performance, Meta says Muse Ember scores around 36 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, on par with Claude Haiku 5.5 at its highest reasoning tier, while costing roughly one third as much per task and beating GPT-6 Luna across all reasoning tiers. Artificial Analysis puts the cost per task at about $0.14 for Muse Ember (max) versus about $0.41 for Claude Haiku 5.5 (max). In the agentic results Artificial Analysis published, Muse Ember scores 68.1% on AutomationBench-AA, level with Muse Wonder and GPT-6 Astra, and 46 on the Coding Agent Index inside Muse Code, ahead of Claude Haiku 5.5's 37 in Claude Code and GPT-6 Luna's 31 in Codex. Coding results are mixed: Muse Ember beats Claude Haiku 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (40.9% vs 32.8%) but trails on FrontierCode 2.0 (27.2% vs 34.9%). Its main weakness is knowledge: AA-Omniscience accuracy of 21.1% is the lowest among similarly intelligent models, mostly because it declines 64% of questions, a trade-off that holds its hallucination rate to 17.4%.

Some figures remain inconsistent or unconfirmed. The Intelligence Index is reported as both 36 and 35.8. The Decoder says Muse Ember falls short on actual programming tasks, which conflicts with Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 result. A set of max-mode benchmark numbers circulated via a Hacker News post cited by 掘金 claims Muse Ember tops 6 of 7 agentic benchmarks and ties GPT-6 Luna on one, but those numbers have not been confirmed by Meta or an independent third party, and the test hardware and setup were not disclosed; they differ markedly from Artificial Analysis's published scores such as AutomationBench-AA.

AI-generated from 19 reports · updated 3 days ago

Latest turnMeta has released Muse Ember, a lightweight model aimed at high-volume agent work such as tool calls, coding subtasks, routing and long-document parsing. Meta says it matches Claude Haiku 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index while costing roughly one-third per task, and it is available now through Meta Model API and Muse Code.

Related AI tools

updream
24-hour heatHeat index 25 · peak 27 · 23h ago
24 hours agonow

Reports on this story headlines open the original

Nov 10
  1. Meta has released Muse Ember, a lightweight model aimed at high-volume agent work such as tool calls, coding subtasks, routing and long-document parsing. Meta says it matches Claude Haiku 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index while costing roughly one-third per task, and it is available now through Meta Model API and Muse Code.

    InfoQ 中文AI score 71
  2. Meta AI has released Muse Ember, which it describes as its smallest and most efficient model, built for the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks, routing, extraction and long document parsing. According to Simon Willison, pricing on shorter prompts matches GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 per million input tokens.

    Simon WillisonAI score 56
  3. Meta has released Muse Ember, its smallest model, with a 1M-token context window aimed at tool calls, coding subtasks and document parsing. According to MarkTechPost, it matches Claude Haiku 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at roughly one-third the cost per task.

    MarkTechPostAI score 62
  4. Meta has released Muse Ember, which it calls its smallest and most efficient model yet, with a 1 million token context window and native understanding of text, images, audio and video. According to Artificial Analysis, it scores 35.8 at its highest reasoning setting, close to Claude Haiku 5.5, while Meta positions it for low-cost, high-token agent workflows.

    智东西AI score 65
  5. Meta has released Muse Ember, a small, efficiency-focused model now available in Muse Code and through the Meta Model API under the ID muse-ember-1.0, aimed at repetitive agent work such as browsing and terminal operations. Benchmarks posted on Hacker News put it first on six of seven agent tests and tied with GPT-6 Luna on the seventh, though neither Meta nor independent testers have confirmed those numbers.

    掘金AI score 58
  6. Meta has introduced Muse Ember, an entry-level AI model that it says costs significantly less than competing offerings and is aimed at powering cost-efficient AI agents, SiliconANGLE reported. Meta said it is the first model trained using Muse Wonder, its flagship large language model, but did not specify which part of the workflow Muse Wonder automated.

    SiliconANGLEAI score 54
  7. Meta has released Muse Ember, its smallest and most efficient model yet, aimed at complex reasoning and repetitive agent tasks with a 1M-token context window and text, image, audio and video input. Meta says it matches Claude Haiku 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis leaderboard at one-third the cost per task, and it is available now through Meta Model API, Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud at $0.10 per 1M input tokens.

    IT之家AI score 62
  8. Meta released Muse Ember on Nov 9 local time, positioning it as its smallest and most efficient model for high-frequency agent work such as tool calls and request routing. Third-party evaluator Artificial Analysis scored it 36 on its intelligence index, level with Claude Haiku 5.5 at its top reasoning setting, at about $0.14 per task versus roughly $0.41. It is live via the Meta Model API at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens.

    cnBetaAI score 59
  9. Meta has released Muse Ember, a model that combines multimodal reasoning with a 1M-token context window and low API pricing, aimed at repetitive coding and agent workloads, according to TestingCatalog.

    TestingCatalogAI score 63
  10. Meta has introduced Muse Ember, its smallest and most efficient model yet, aimed at repetitive agent work such as tool calls, routing and data extraction. Meta claims it delivers more intelligence per dollar than Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna, though it falls short on actual programming tasks.

    The DecoderAI score 67
  11. Meta released Muse Ember, its smallest and cheapest model yet, built for repetitive agent jobs such as tool calls, coding subtasks, routing, data extraction and parsing long documents. Input pricing is $0.10 per million tokens, and Meta says it matches Claude Haiku at a third of the cost per task.

    The Next WebAI score 73
  12. Meta Superintelligence Lab released Muse Ember on Monday, calling it the lab's lightest and most cost-efficient AI model yet. Meta says it delivers more intelligence per dollar than Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna, though those comparisons come from the company and no specific benchmark scores were included.

    TechmemeAI score 62
  13. Artificial Analysis reports that Muse Ember scores 21.1% on AA-Omniscience, the lowest among the similarly intelligent models it compared, largely because it declines to answer 64% of questions. That abstention keeps its hallucination rate at 17.4%.

    X:Artificial Analysis (@artificialanlys)First-partyAI score 42
  14. Artificial Analysis says Muse Ember scores 46 on its Coding Agent Index inside Muse Code, ahead of Claude Haiku 5.5 in Claude Code (37) and GPT-6 Luna in Codex (31). It attributes the lead mainly to SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA and Terminal-Bench 4.0.

    X:Artificial Analysis (@artificialanlys)First-partyAI score 46
  15. Artificial Analysis reports that Muse Ember scores 68.1% on AutomationBench-AA, level with Muse Wonder and GPT-6 Astra. Its coding results are mixed: it leads Claude Haiku 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (40.9% vs 32.8%) but trails on FrontierCode 2.0 (27.2% vs 34.9%).

    X:Artificial Analysis (@artificialanlys)First-partyAI score 41
  16. Artificial Analysis notes that Muse Ember (max) matches Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) and GPT-6 Luna (max) on input and output token prices, but its cached input is 60% cheaper. Since cached input dominates cost in its agentic evaluations, Muse Ember ends up cheaper per task than similarly priced models.

    X:Artificial Analysis (@artificialanlys)First-partyAI score 50
  17. Artificial Analysis reports that Muse Ember, Meta's newest efficient-tier model, scores 36 on its Intelligence Index, matching Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) at roughly a third of the cost per task. Input and output token prices are the same as Claude Haiku 5.5.

    X:Artificial Analysis (@artificialanlys)First-partyAI score 51
  18. TestingCatalog reports that Meta's new Muse Ember model is now available on the Meta Model API and in Muse Code. The model is positioned as small and low-cost, with performance said to be on par with Claude 5.5 Haiku.

    X:TestingCatalog (@testingcatalog)AI score 57
  19. Meta Superintelligence Lab released Muse Ember, its lightest and cheapest model yet, at 10 cents per million input tokens, aimed at the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks, routing, extraction and long document parsing. Meta says Ember is cheaper and smarter than Anthropic's Haiku and OpenAI's Luna on Artificial Analysis's composite benchmark, and positions it alongside a larger model like Muse Wonder that plans while Ember executes.

    TechCrunch · AIAI score 57

Other stories people are talking about

How is heat calculated?About the method

Heat counts how many independent sources covered a story in the last 48 hours: one source counts once no matter how many posts it published, decaying with a 24-hour half-life. What ranks first is what many people are talking about.

This page aggregates public feeds. Headlines and summaries are machine-organized and remain the property of the original authors; verify important facts at the source. If you believe a headline or summary infringes your rights, email the contact address in the footer with the page URL and basis of your claim, and we will remove or replace it after review.

Surge
Discussion rising fast
New
First report within 6 hours
Rising
Still gathering discussion

Back to AI industry updates →